Category: show on landing page

DATACTIVE brunch with Noortje Marres

We had the luxury of Noortje Marres (Associate Professor at the Centre for Interdisciplinary Methodologies, Warwick University) joining us for a late breakfast on Friday, February 9th. Over croissants, we touched upon various topics including data politics, and interdisciplinary research: breaking barriers and other intersectionalities. 


Noortje Marres is part of the DATACTIVE advisory board, find her bio below:

My work contributes to the interdisciplinary field of Science, Technology and Society (STS) and investigates issues at the intersection of innovation, everyday environments and public politics: participation in technological societies; the role of mundane objects and devices in engagement; living experiments; the changing relations between social life and social science in a digital age. I also work on research methodology, in particular, issue mapping, and am interested in developing creative forms of inquiry between the social sciences, technology and the arts.

PhD defence: Lonneke now Dr. Lonneke van der Velden

Thursday February 8th, Lonneke van der Velden successfully defended her thesis Surveillance as public matter: Revisiting sousveillance through devices and leaks and is hereby awarded the title PhD title Dr. Please find a summary below.

Abstract

Our conceptual understanding of surveillance is continuously challenged by digital innovations. Projects that render (digital) surveillance visible and knowable become interesting analytic starting points. Since surveillance consists of technical and often secret processes, this ‘rendering visible’ inevitably requires a form of translation. This translation process is the main concern of this dissertation: How is surveillance made public? That question is tackled by combining an empirical inquiry on how surveillance is traced, made visible and understandable with a conceptual search for new vocabularies to address surveillance practices and countermeasures.

This thesis presents four case studies into four so-called ‘sousveillance’ projects: two counter-tracking devices for mobile phones and web browsing (InformaCam and Ghostery), and two leaks of surveillance repositories (WikiLeaks and the NSA disclosures). Inspired by Actor Network Theory (ANT), these projects are analysed through the notion of the socio-technical ‘device’ with a sensitivity to the materiality of publics. Specific focus is placed on the instruments through which surveillance is brought to the fore, the transformations that take place, the importance of the different settings, and the kinds of publics these configurations (could) enact.

The analysis, combining Surveillance Studies and ANT, shows that sousveillance has a contextually embedded, and publicly relevant, research dimension. In short, in tackling surveillance, the projects turn surveillance into a public resource for re-appropriation, into ‘public matter’. The conclusion outlines a research agenda into ‘surveillance publics’, publics that combine privacy practices with making things public. Lastly, the dissertation calls for more collaboration between academics and technical surveillance experts.

Available now: Report on Data for the Social Good

We are happy to share with you the report of our two-day Data for the Social Good event the 16th and 17th of November. The report includes both the first public evening organised at Spui25 *, and our invitation-only second day of lectures in the morning and workshops in the afternoon. To all participants, thank you for joining us for this great event and thanks to Spui25 for hosting us!

Please find the report included below, and do feel free to help share / disseminate our collective findings.

A PDF version can be downloaded here.

Also, we would give our thanks to all the speakers, Charlotte Ryan (Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Massachusetts), Lorenzo Pezzani (architect and researcher, and lecturer at the Goldsmith University of London), Jeff Deutch (Syrian Archive, PhD candidate at the Humboldt-University in Berlin), Niko Para (Syrian Archive, lead technologist), and moderator Fieke Jansen (independent researcher).

* Click here to watch the public event @Spui25

 

DATACTIVE_DataSocialGood2017_Report

 

Data for the Social Good brings together scholars and practitioners to explore the politics of big data from the perspective of activism and civil society.

Data for the Social Good is sponsored by the European Research Council (ERC), the Amsterdam Centre for Globalisation Studies (ACGS) and the Amsterdam School of Cultural Analysis (ASCA).

 

ERC

acgs-logo

asca-logo-hippo-m

b_1_q_0_p_0 (2)

Niels and Stefania at the Internet Governance Forum 2017 in Geneva

Niels and Stefania will be in Geneva in mid-December for the 2017 edition of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), taking place at the United Nations Office at Geneva on December 18-21. The IGF is a global multistakeholder forum that promotes discussions and dialogue about public policy issues related to the Internet. It was convened in 2006 by the United Nations Secretary-General. This year’s will the the IGF’s 12th edition.

Among other things, DATACTIVE will be featured in one of the main sessions, entitled Local interventions, global impacts: How can international, multistakeholder cooperation address internet disruptions, encryption and data flows, and  discussing the impacts that national policy initiatives may have on the global Internet environment and the jurisdictional issues still to be solved (December 18). Stefania will speak in the sub-them of “data flows”. In addition, DATACTIVE is co-hosting, in collaborating with the Data Justice Lab at Cardiff University a workshop entitled “Datafication and Social Justice: What challenges for Internet Governance?” (December 21). 

Stefania keynotes at workshop on slow computing, Maynooth, Ireland, 14 December

Stefania will take part in ‘Slow computing: A workshop on resistance in the algorithmic age’, organised by Rob Kitchin and Alistair Fraser and hosted by the  Programmable City project, the Social Sciences Institute and the Department of Geography of Maynooth University, Ireland. “In line with the parallel concepts of slow food (e.g. Miele & Murdoch 2002) or slow scholarship (Mountz et al 2015), ‘slow computing’ (Fraser 2017) is a provocation to resist”, reads the call for papers. Check out the program and the line-up. Stefania’s presentation is titled “Resist, subvert, accelerate. Towards an ethics of engagement in the age of the computational theocracy”.

Stefania contributing to ‘Social Impact of Alpha and Gamma Sciences’ (@ScienceWorks)

Thursday, December 7, 2017 – Stefania Milan is one of the speakers at the fourth edition of the annual “Alfa Gamma Valorization Congress”. With the presentation of the National Science Agenda, in which alpha-gamma science plays a key role, the event will renew its impact on society.

During the conference, participants and speakers from science, government and business will discuss Social Challenges for Scientific Research. The conference will focus on how we can optimize synergy between societal issues and alpha / gamma sciences, addressing the following questions:

– How can we successfully shape cooperation between society and science?
– What roles can researchers and their social partners take?
– What is demand management at (inter) national, regional and local level?

 

About ScienceWorks

ScienceWorks supports the process of value creation out of scientific research for society. Our approach is to draw on the expertise of sector experts and to apply good practices from around the world. Value creation out of scientific research contributes to our economy and society. We help to optimize this process through the correct use of instruments and to support new connections.

The fields we are active in:
Transferring scientific knowledge to society
Improving processes of value creation out of scientific research
Optimizing the regional innovation system
Internationalization of high tech clusters
Ranking and measuring the impact of university knowledge transfer
Analyzing and supporting science based incubators & science parks

Stefania keynotes at LAVITS in Santiago de Chile, November 29

DPGpgHVWAAEbnrCIn November 20-30 Stefania will be in Santiago de Chile for a number of talks. She will keynote at the 5th International Symposium of the Red Latinoamericana de Etudios en Vigilancia, Technología y Sociedad, organised by Universidad de Chile with the non-governmental organization Datos Protegidos, whose theme this year is Vigilancia, Democracia y Privacidad en América Latina: vulnerabilidades y resistencias.

Stefania will also meet digital rights activists and participate in the following events: the workshop ‘Designing people by numbers’ with Celia Lury (Warwick University) at the Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile on November 21st; a ‘conversatorio’ with the Red Chilena Estudios Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad at the Universidad Diego Portales, on November 23rd; a ‘conversatorio’ with members of the Humanities Faculty, Campus Juan Gomez Millas University of Chile on November 27th.

 

 

Connecting to the Masses – 100 Years from the Russian Revolution @IIHS with Stefania & Lonneke

Internetional Institute for Social History in Amsterdam

Mon, Nov 13, 2017, 9:00 AM –
Tue, Nov 14, 2017, 6:00 PM

Together with Athina Karatzogianni and Andrey Rezaev, Stefania Milan organises ‘Connecting to the Masses – 100 Years from the Russion Revolution: From Agitprop to the Attention Economy’. The two-day event will be helt November 13th to the 14th at the International Institute for Social History and the University of Amsterdam. Lonneke van der Velden will be present ‘Daguerrotypes of protest: the Paris Commune’s media activism and present-day ‘social media revolutions’ on Day two. For more information about the schedule and tickets, check the eventbrite page.

About the two-day event

The relationship between governments and the people they govern has been always hostage to rhetoric, propaganda, and strategic public relations, as well as aggressive marketing and the influence of contemporary media industries, altering the dynamics of healthy political communications. Often, this relationship has thrived on charismatic leaders, the “avant-garde”, who could feel the pulse of their population’s grievances, demands and hopes for the future. Whether the Russian revolution of 1917 is interpreted as a product of class struggle, as an event governed by historic laws predetermined by the alienation of the masses by monopoly industrial capitalism, or as a violent coup by a proto-totalitarian Bolshevik party, the Russian revolutionaries understood and connected to the masses in a way that the autocracy, bourgeois elites and reformists alike failed to do.

In the midst of rage, desperation and harsh everyday life conditions, due to the pressure and failures of WW1 against Germany, food shortages, growing poverty, inequality and alienation, the Bolsheviks felt the undercurrents in the seas of history and spoke to the people, exactly when the relationship between the Tsar and the population, and between the Provisional government and the Soviets were at a crucial tipping point. The Bolsheviks grasped the opportunity to change the world for themselves in the here and now, rather than waiting to reform in the future for their children. They did so violently and unapologetically with the effects of their move running through the Cold War and the confrontation with the West, all the way to the complex and intense relations between Russia and the United States, in terms of failed engagements of the past 25 years since the fall of the USSR, the first socialist state in the world.

About the organisers

The conference is organised through a collaboration between Athina Karatzogianni from the School of Media, Communication and Sociology of the University of Leicester; Stefania Milan from the DATACTIVE research group at the Media Studies department of the University of Amsterdam; Andrey Rezaev from the Department of Sociology at St. Petersburg State University; the International Institute of Social History, Amsterdam; and the State Museum of Contemporary Art, Thessaloniki.

 

logo (1)asca-logo-hippo-m uol logo logo-en

 

 

 

Comunidades de base y datos: un ejemplo desde el Valle de México

Guillén Torres y Maylí Sepúlveda

In this short piece, Guillén Torres and Maylí Sepúlveda reflect on information’s power to bring people together, creating communities around issues that need the cooperation of diverse actors to be tackled. They briefly draw from their own experience working for Controla Tu Gobierno, a Méxican NGO who is currently developing a social accountability process with a focus on water management in the Valley of Mexico.

En este pequeño texto, Guillén Torres y Maylí Sepúlveda reflexionan en torno al poder de la información para crear comunidades alrededor de problemas que necesitan resolverse a través de la colaboración de diversos actores. Los autores retoman brevemente su experiencia trabajando en Controla Tu Gobierno, una ONG Mexicana que se encuentra desarrollando un proceso de auditoría social enfocado al manejo del Agua en el Valle de México.

Ser un activista de datos es un proceso complejo. Hay que buscar o producir los datos, procesarlos, convertirlos en infografías o textos de análisis, y socializarlos, ya sea para denunciar problemáticas o influir en procesos políticos. En ese camino, también ocurre otra cosa que a veces pasa desapercibida: quienes buscaron la información, la discutieron y la tradujeron, desarrollan nuevos lazos durante el proceso. Los datos los asociaron con nuevos actores, sucesos y componentes del entorno, exhibieron conexiones entre problemas y soluciones, y convirtieron asuntos que parecían ser individuales o que se sentían lejanos, en cuestiones comunes, compartidas, relacionales y cercanas. Más allá del poder que tienen los datos para fomentar el involucramiento de la ciudadanía en los asuntos públicos, su característica más importante nos parece esa, la posibilidad que brindan de generar discusiones públicas, articular comunidades, construir identidades colectivas y alimentar programas políticos.

Sin embargo, para sacar provecho de estas posibilidades es necesario pensar los datos menos como una mercancía  -que es la misma narrativa que constantemente empuja a entenderlos como el nuevo petróleo- y más como un recurso cargado de significado. Esta visión crítica es relativamente reciente, pero ha empezado a ganar fuerza en el Sur Global. Sin embargo, en países como México, por ejemplo, donde los activistas de datos aún son principalmente jóvenes educados de áreas urbanas, todavía ocurre con frecuencia que los proyectos que pretenden tener impacto social reproducen inadvertidamente prácticas excluyentes: los hackatones retoman por unas horas problemáticas que afectan profundamente la vida de miembros de la sociedad que no participan activamente en los eventos, y generan soluciones que permiten a gobiernos promocionar apps y hacer marketing. Y luego se van. Las poblaciones sobre las cuales se produjeron los datos -que de hecho son datos sobre sus vidas y sobre lo buenas o malas que son-, reciben pocos beneficios (o ninguno), pero su información se incorpora al stock masivo de datos que permite a empresas y al estado tomar decisiones y crear valor. En este sentido, ocurre una exclusión doble; la mayoría de los productores de datos quedan fuera del procesamiento de la información y también quedan fuera de la repartición de los beneficios.

¿Cómo puede establecerse una relación distinta entre activistas, comunidades y datos? ¿Una relación que no alimente dinámicas jerárquicas o de explotación, y que vuelva protagonistas a las comunidades productoras de datos? Dentro de la organización sin fines de lucro ControlaTuGobierno (CTG), dedicamos bastante energía a buscar una respuesta a esa pregunta.

Schermafdruk van 2017-11-06 15.08.22

Los ciudadanos organizados que conocen el derecho de acceso a la información, lo utilizan como herramienta para ejercer otros derechos.

Desde 2013, CTG se ha enfocado en desarrollar modelos alternativos de contraloría social de la acción gubernamental, que buscan ir más allá de convertir a los ciudadanos en agentes fiscalizadores. Ahora que reflexionamos a la distancia en torno a los proyectos que la organización desarrolla, creemos que uno de los aciertos de su metodología ha sido el énfasis en el trabajo con comunidades de base. Construyendo sobre procesos en marcha, en los que una comunidad se ha organizado para enfrentar problemas comunes, CTG muestra a los ciudadanos cómo el uso de la información pública y los datos abiertos puede fortalecer sus actividades. Si la comunidad acepta recibir asesoría de CTG, se inicia un proceso colectivo a través del cual, a partir de información pública, los ciudadanos traducen la problemática que los afecta en a) un problema colectivo; b) un problema relacionado con alguna dimensión de la acción gubernamental; c) un problema conectado con derechos humanos.

Al centro de este acercamiento se encuentra una visión de la información pública y los datos abiertos como una especie de mapa, que además de comunicar el resultado de las decisiones tomadas por los agentes gubernamentales, también visibiliza claramente los elementos y los procesos internos que las componen. En este sentido, a través de la información pública se pueden reconstruir mecanismos e idiosincrasias institucionales que usualmente quedan fuera de la idea de la rendición de cuentas, y cuya visibilización es crucial para desarrollar activismo con un impacto real. Así, la información gubernamental no sólo permite entender cuáles decisiones se tomaron, sino también por  qué, cómo y quién las tomó, lo cual abre la posibilidad de que la ciudadanía influya (y no sólo vigile) procesos que de otra manera permanecen en la sombras.

Durante los últimos dos años, ControlaTuGobierno ha estado probando este modelo de contraloría social sobre el Programa de Tratamiento de Aguas Residuales (PROTAR), una política pública a nivel federal en México, cuyo objetivo es garantizar el acceso al derecho al agua de calidad para los habitantes del país. Aunque el proyecto también implica utilizar la información pública para evaluar el desempeño del PROTAR, el objetivo principal de CTG es involucrar a los ciudadanos en el manejo de los recursos hídricos cercanos a su lugar de residencia. En este sentido, la información pública se está usando como una fuente para entender la problemática local del agua tanto en su dimensión medioambiental (analizando información sobre el agua y las comunidades que la necesitan), como en su dimensión institucional (procesando y compartiendo información sobre cómo se administra). A través de este análisis doble es posible mapear a los actores públicos y privados involucrados, así como los vínculos que establecen entre sí , el marco legal, y las oportunidades de apropiación de otros derechos.

Schermafdruk van 2017-11-06 15.09.03

Las sesiones de trabajo colectivo generan procesos de intercambio de conocimientos y fortalecen los lazos comunitarios

Uno de los objetivos principales del proyecto es el fortalecimiento de la Comisión de la Subcuenca de Xochimilco y sus Afluentes, un organismo formado por habitantes de la región, que funcionará como intermediario entre las necesidades locales y las instituciones encargadas de la gestión del agua a nivel federal. Pero para lograr la subsistencia de este organismo a largo plazo, es necesario que todos los actores relevantes, sean gubernamentales o no gubernamentales, trabajen en conjunto. Durante el desarrollo de proyectos anteriores hemos aprendido que la información pública y los datos abiertos tienen la capacidad de aglutinar distintos tipos de actores y alinear sus intereses, que usualmente parecen encontrados. Esto se debe a que la descoordinación que ocurre al interior de las instituciones, y también entre gobierno y ciudadanos organizados, se origina en falta de información. Por ejemplo, en el proyecto actual de contraloría social del agua descubrimos que no son sólo los ciudadanos quienes no están al tanto del presupuesto público, de cómo se ejerce, quiénes son los encargados de ejercerlo y en qué puede gastarse, sino que los mismos actores institucionales lo ignoran también. Lo mismo sucede respecto a los datos abiertos relacionados con el servicio de aguas; aunque podrían eficientar su gestión, los niveles locales de gobierno desconocen su existencia.

En términos generales, nuestra experiencia indica que cuando ciudadanos, instituciones públicas, academia y actores privados, convergen dentro de una misma comunidad organizada en torno a un problema, y recaban y analizan en conjunto información pública, las diferencias de poder e información se reducen y las interacciones entre ellos se vuelven menos accidentadas. Además, las personas involucradas se escuchan unos a otros, lo cual fomenta la creación de lazos comunitarios a largo plazo.

Si quieres saber más sobre las metodologías de ControlaTuGobierno, puedes visitar su página web: ControlaTuGobierno.com

 

guillen

Guillén Torres es estudiante de doctorado dentro del proyecto DATACTIVE, en la Universidad de Ámsterdam. Su investigación está enfocada en las reacciones institucionales frente al uso que la sociedad civil hace de los datos abiertos y la información pública.

 

Schermafdruk van 2017-11-06 15.09.25Maylí Sepúlveda es directora general de Controla Tu Gobierno. Ha sido consultora de la William & Flora Hewlett Foundation, International Budget Partnership, Banco Mundial, Global Initiative for Fiscal Transparency y el PNUD.

DATACTIVE presents… ‘Data for the Social Good’ (Amsterdam, 16-17 Nov)

As every aspect of our daily lives becomes susceptible of turning into data being collected, analyzed and repurposed, the question arises what kind of consequences this process will bring for society. The goal of this event is to reflect upon how activism, data, and research may be mobilized for social good. The speakers (see below) are experts developing projects related to topics such as human rights, environmental justice, and international law, from an approach located at the crossroads of academia and civil society.

The event is in two parts: an evening session on November 16 open to the public and organized in collaboration with SPUI25 and a day-long session on November 17 with restricted participation, and a combination of talks (in the morning) and moderated sessions in the afternoon.

 

Please find the report on this event here.

 

DAY 1: Data for the Social Good (SOLD OUT)

16 November 2017, 8pm-9.30pm, @ SPUI25, Spui 25, 1012 XA, Amsterdam
This event is fully booked, but tickets might become available just before the start. Also, a live-stream will be set up by Spui25 here at 8pm.

Join us for an evening about ‘research that matters’, exploring ways of collecting and processing data for social causes. Just as socioeconomic data about us are used by institutions to decide upon the allocation of budgets for public health, housing or urban planning, and behavioural data helps businesses to determine their location or set their prices, digital data are also mobilised by activists to legitimize their struggles against poverty, racism or injustice. Recently, as every aspect of our daily lives has turned into data susceptible of being quantified, processed and repurposed, it is not only the metrics created about us that are used as input for all kinds of decision-making, but those generated by us through the daily use of different types of technologies.

Although we hear a lot about the risks of (personal) data being used by corporations and states, there are also many examples of usage by organisations or individuals with the goal of improving society. From crowd-sourced maps about the ‘femicide’ epistemic in Latin America to the analysis of videos and photos to reconstruct drone attacks, data produced by people is mobilised for social good. The goal of this event is to reflect upon the possibilities for research and activism (and potential combinations) brought about by the massive production, collection and availability of data.

With the help of Charlotte Ryan (Media Research and Action Project/ MRAP, University of Massachusetts Lowell), Lorenzo Pezzani (Forensic Architecture, Goldsmiths), and Jeff Deutch and Niko Para (The Syrian Archive), the event will focus on discussing different dimensions of activist research. Fieke Jansen will be moderating the evening.

 

DAY 2: Data for the Social Good: A Focused Encounter

17 November 2017 9am-4pm, @E-Lab, Turfdraagsterpad 9 (room 0.16*), 1012 XT Amsterdam
* turn right after the entrance, room 0.16 is located at the end.

Should you want to participate, please drop an email to jeroen@data-activism.net. Seating is limited but we particularly welcome scholars interested in exploring the relationship between academia, action and policy.

DATACTIVE: Focused Encounter will be an exploration into ‘data activist research’ through a one-day workshop. The event will be the first in a series of seminars organized by DATACTIVE as an attempt to bridge theory and praxis, as well as to establish a network of activist-researchers and researching-activists working on themes of mutual interest around the politics of datafication.

DATACTIVE explores the responses to datafication and massive data collection, as they are implemented by citizens and organized civil society. As part of this program, we have adopted an ‘engaged’ approach to research by virtue of which we produce scientifically sound knowledge, while simultaneously paying attention to the impact this process might have on people and communities (see Milan, 2010). Furthermore, since we want to contribute to empower activists and citizens to think critically about datafication, empowerment and surveillance, we are currently exploring experimental research methods capable of bringing together activist communities and academia to develop joint research questions and/or projects. In this sense, on a more practical level, the goal of this first Focused Encounter is to start charting out a ‘data activist’ research agenda that takes into account this community building, mutual learning and knowledge-sharing mission. On a theoretical level the goal of the Focused Encounter is to discuss different aspects of inclusion and democracy, evidence and knowledge production, and the promises and perils of data activism and datafication more in general.

The event will consist of a morning program (9:15 – 12:30) featuring three speakers who will showcase ways of doing engaged research as well as the related challenges, followed by a moderated discussion. After lunch there is room for discussion and knowledge exchange in small moderated groups, for those who are interested (highly recommended), followed by about an hour of focused discussion and brainstorming. We will work together until approximately 16:00 and then have drinks.

 

Schedule

Morning:
9:15 -9:30 Welcome by Stefania Milan.
9:30 -10:00 Charlotte Ryan. “Building sustained research collaborations.”
10:00 – 10:30 Lorenzo Pezzani (Forensic Architecture). “Forensic Oceanography: Documenting the violence of the EU’s Maritime Frontier.”
10:30 – 10:45 COFFEE BREAK
10:45 – 11:15 Jeff Deutch and Niko Para (Syrian Archive). “Archiving for accountability: Collaboratively preserving, verifying and investigating open-source documentation of rights abuses in Syria.”
11:15 – 12:30 Discussion on ‘Data activist research’, moderated by Lonneke van der Velden.

Afternoon:
The afternoon session will provide space to reflect and look forward. What is needed, for us as a data-activist community, is to accelerate and expand our engaged and action-oriented research practices? Based on the diverse expert insights we gained during the morning session we will collectively start crafting an engaged research agenda for data activist research.

13:30 -14:00 Collective brainstorm. Moderator: Kersti Wissenbach.
14:00 – 16:00 Break- out sessions
15:30 – 16:00 Reporting back.
16:00 Closure

After 16:00 Drinks @Cafe de Jaren (Nieuwe Doelenstraat 20 – 22, 1012 CP / Amsterdam)

 

About the speakers

The speakers are invited to present their research projects, experiences and results, and to discuss with DATACTIVE members and attendees questions relating to research ethics, engaged research as well as data activism, its problems and outcomes.

Charlotte Ryan is an Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Massachusetts, Lowell, and the co-founder (with Bill Gamson) of the Movement/Media Research and Action Project (a research group that aims to strengthen progressive social movements working toward social justice and inclusive and participatory democracy). Ryan worked also as an organizer in labor, community, health and anti-intervention movements, and has extensive experience with collaborative work between academia and activism. She is also a member of the DATACTIVE Ethics Board.

Lorenzo Pezzani is an architect and researcher. He is currently Lecturer at Goldsmiths, University of London, where he leads the MA studio in Forensic Architecture. His work deals with the spatial politics and visual cultures of migration, with a particular focus on the geography of the ocean. Since 2011, he has been working on Forensic Oceanography, a collaborative project that critically investigate the militarized border regime in the Mediterranean Sea, and has co-founded the WatchTheMed platform. Together with a wide network of NGOs, scientists, journalists, and activist groups, he has produced maps, videos and human right reports that attempt to document and challenge the ongoing death of migrants at sea.

Jeff Deutch & Niko Para are members of The Syrian Archive, a Syrian-led collective of human rights activists dedicated to preserving open-source visual documentation relating to human rights violations committed by all sides during the Syrian conflict. Through collecting, curating, verifying and investigating digital content, the Syrian Archive aims to preserve data as a digital memory, to establish a verified database of human rights violations for reporting and advocacy purposes, and to act as an evidence tool for legally implementing justice and accountability efforts as concept and practice in Syria. Jeff Deutch is a fellow at the Centre for Internet and Human Rights and a PhD candidate at the Humboldt-University in Berlin. He has developed workflows and methodologies for open-source investigations of human rights violations. Niko Para is The Syrian Archive’s lead technologist, where he develops the Sugarcube sequential data investigation pipeline for secure collection, preservation, transformation of user-generated content. He has worked with Tactical Technology Collective, Global Witness, as well as numerous smaller agricultural, artistic, and musical organisations and collectives. He unapologetically plays the banjo.

Fieke Jansen is an independent researcher. Until recently, she worked on the Politics of Data programme for Tactical Tech. Previous to that, she helped set up and manage the digital emergency programme for human rights defenders and activists at Hivos. She also co-authored the book Digital AlterNatives.